April in Review

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Updates
Photo: NS coal train on the Sandusky Division. Not a great photo, but I consider it not too bad considering I was shooting a moving train from a moving car.

It’s been a busy month on Ohio Valley Rail. The site now a domain, a new design, and new features. To top it off April has been the busiest month in site history. It looks like we’ll smash the previous record of 13 posts in a month. This has only been possible thanks to the many readers who visit this blog daily and give me the motivation to write these posts. Some posts turn out better than others, but I want to take a moment and say thanks.

Here are some of my favorite posts from this past month. They represent the best of the blog over the last 30 days.

In the next couple of weeks expect to see some posts with information about the Ohio Hub passenger rail plan, a Conrail track chart from 1981, and maybe even a book review. If any of that sounds remotely interesting to you then subscribe or you might miss it.

More Things to Learn

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Model Railroad

Last week on Wednesday I told the of everything I had learned from my bridge building experience. The more I learn about modeling it seems the less I really know. In a similar discussion I started on the trains.com model railroading forums there were many more tips that were discussed. Many of the members there are a lot more experienced than me and it shows. Here’s a list with some of the best advice I may have not known or remembered to mention last week.

Take Your Time

For many people this goes without saying. Some like to take care of every detail along the way. For others building a kit is more like a race to the finished product. Don’t let dreams of the future hurt the quality of your work. Some kits take more time than others. Don’t try to build the entire thing in one evening. You may come to regret your haste later.

Use A Sprue As A Handle

This is a tip of knew but forgot to bring up in my last article. Often it is a smart idea to paint a plastic part before you take it off the sprue. This allows you to use the sprue as a handle and avoid getting fingerprints on the part or paint on your hand. You might need to do a little touch-up when you finally do cut it off, but this is better than dealing with smudges all over your finished work.

Be Neat With Your Glue

This is another one of those things that is often learned through experience. No matter how much I would hear about using my glue sparingly I would always apply it in healthy amounts. Ending up with glue up and down the jeoints of my building soon ended that. Today I apply my glue in small dots up and down the part that I’m assembling. Then, I take an old paint brush and brush it out. The amount of surface that gets glued stays the same, but the amount of glue is far less.

Experience Counts

Don’t let a bad model get you down. Everyone has to deal with that one kit that just didn’t turn out right. Your skills will improve over time. Someday, you might even be able to go back and fix some kits that didn’t work right the first time around. Don’t get discouraged and move on to your next project. Remember this is suppose to be fun, and much of the fun is in the journey!


This post concludes my little series on kit building…at least until the next disaster hits my workbench. Have any more tips that haven’t been mentioned? Don’t be afraid to leave them in the comments below. And if you like these articles don’t forget to subscribe.

Layout Progress – April 2009

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Model Railroad

My week of Spring Break was a very productive week for my layout. I made a number of improvements to the benchwork and even reached the point in some locations where the roadbed is ready for track.

Since this picture was taken I have finished painting the sky (thanks to help from my sister) and painted some clouds in the sky. In the coming weeks I have to put foam and cork down on the other side of the room. Soon I will be ready to start purchasing track, which brings up a whole new set of questions.

I’m still debating what to do about my track situation. My track plan is relatively simple, but even still my most generous estimates call for over $500 of track to finish the room. The experts aren’t kidding when they say that track is the most expensive part of layout construction. It’s not like you can even put if off like scenery. You have to have track to have a railroad.

Right now I’m leaning towards the Fast Tracks system for my turnouts. The majority of turnouts on my plan are all #5′s, and by purchasing the Fast Tracks jig I could greatly simplify their construction. This requires a large expense for the jig, but in the long run I calculate this would be cheaper than buying Shinohara turnouts. In addition it’s really my only option for Code 70.

For the two curved turnouts in my design I plan on using the Central Valley turnout system. They use injection molded tie strips as the foundation for their turnouts and include the ability to curve.

Originally I planned to connect everything using Micro Engineering’s Code 70 track. However, given how pricey track has turned out to be I’m reconsidering my options. Instead I may also purchase Central Valley tie strips for the straightaways and curves. These have the advantage of being self-gauging while still being cheaper then prefabricated flex track. I’m already going to have to be buying rail for the turnouts and my bridge, so it’s not much of a stretch to use my rail for the mainline too.

As always, this could still change. These ideas are just what I’m leaning towards. I have not really made up my mind. What do you think? Have you used any of these products on your own model railroad?


On a completely unrelated note, did you know that Ohio Valley Railroads has its own Facebook page? Through the magic of RSS you can actually view posts on Facebook as they appear on the main site. So if you have a Facebook profile, log on and become a fan of Ohio Valley Railroads today!

CL&N’s Oak Street Tunnel

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: History Railroads: ,
Photo: Interior Shot of the ‘s Walnut Hills Tunnel7

In Cincinnati at the head of the Deer Creek Valley lies a transit relic that few people know even exists. Just a small distance from I-71 sits one of the few railroad tunnels of southwestern Ohio. A little over 600 feet long, with a 19 foot bore the Oak Street tunnel, also known as the Walnut Hills tunnel, allowed the CL&N to enter Cincinnati from the northeast.1

Not to be confused with the more ambitious Deer Creek Tunnel that was never completed, the Oak Street Tunnel was started on by the Miami Valley Railway in 1877.2 The tunnel, as well as the entire grade from Norwood to Cincinnati was only partially completed before the Miami Valley went bankrupt 1880. The successor to the Miami Valley, the Cincinnati Northern (which would come to be succeeded by the CL&N many years later), eventually completed the tunnel in 1882.3

Photo: Tunnel interior shot that showcases the detail in the brick.8

The Oak Street Tunnel was built using the “cut and cover” method that was common for shallow tunnels. A trench was dug out of the hard clay and shale of Walnut Hills. A lining 24 to 32 inches thick was then built around the tunnel out of brick. When this was completed the remainder of the cut above the tunnel was then filled level again with the surface. Much of the dirt excavated was later used in fills elsewhere on the line.4

Construction proceeded quickly and dangerously. Dynamite was used day and night to blast rock apart with little regard for safety of nearby residents. In June 1881 one of the workers was killed by a stone that landed two hundred yards away from the blasting site. Later in July a young boy from Walnut Hills was killed again by a falling rock, causing the court to order a stop to blasting until more extensive screening was put in place. Even so, another accident injured several workers in late August.3

The first trains began running through the tunnel and down the Deer Creek Valley on January 12, 1882.4 Two narrow gauge tracks were laid on the ground along the 26 foot wide tunnel floor. When the CL&N was converted to standard gauge in 1894 the tunnel was likewise converted to dual standard gauge track. However, the tunnel was designed for narrow gauge trains and was not wide enough for two standard gauge trains to past. A set of electric signals was set up to grant track rights on a first-come first-served basis.

Photo: South tunnel portal after gauntlet track was constructed. Photo by Lad G. Arend.2

This arrangement lasted until 1916 when by chance a northbound CL&N train and a southbound N&W passenger train tripped the signals at the same time and sideswiped each other in the tunnel. No one was hurt, but not long after the Pennsylvania Railroad relaid the tracks as a gauntlet, where two tracks would overlap each other.6

Photo: Tunnel exterior7

Today the tunnel is still there, lying empty since the Pennsylvania abandoned regular service through the Deer Creek Valley line in 1969 and lifted the track in 1975.5 The south portal lies just north of Oak Street a little bit east of Interstate 71. The tunnel was constructed on a slight curve and emerges into a short cut just north of McMillian Street. This cut has poor drainage and even when the line was active there often was standing water along the sides of the track. From the cut the roadbed then proceeds under McMillian Street in a stone underpass that is often visible from I-71 during the winter. The ties of the one track that remained before abandonment still lie along the floor of the tunnel.

Photo: Tunnel interior shot.8

Over one hundred years after its construction the tunnel is still in good shape. As the title photo shows, the arch brickwork has few cracks and the concrete base is still solid.7 However the future of the Oak Street Tunnel after the abandonment of the former CL&N is unclear. Much of the former CL&N right-of-way, including the tunnel, was purchased by SORTA in the later half of the century.4 Often it has been considered as part of a light rail proposal using the former CL&N from downtown along I-71.

However, plans to use the tunnel face a number of problems. The tunnel under Walnut Hills still cannot handle two standard gauge trains at one time. The same curse that struck in the early 1900′s may remove the tunnel from further consideration as a light rail option. Additionally, the ROW suffers from a number of discontinuities from development both north and south of the tunnel.

Looking Down McMillian

Even today the future of the tunnel remains in doubt. The picture above, courtesy of Cincinnati Traction History, shows a partially collapse of the sidewalk on the north side of the McMillian overpass. It is unknown how much damage was actually done, and at the very least some cosmetic damage was done to the stonework. It is also unclear if natural erosion was the cause or if the nearby fire hydrant and water main were to blame. What is clear is that the future of this historic transit relic is by no means guaranteed.

Next time you’re driving North on I-71, take a quick look to the right before you pass under McMillian Street. You just might see part of the railroad that had a profound effect on Cincinnati’s east side, if not on the city itself.

References:

  1. Jake Mecklenborg, “Oak Street Tunnel”, Cincinnati Transit. Accessed 22 April 2009.
  2. John W. Hauck, Narrow Gauge in Ohio: The Cincinnati, Lebanon & Northern Railway (Boulder: Pruett Publishing Company, 1986), 35.
  3. “The Little Giant”, 55-57.
  4. “The Secret Contract”, 36.
  5. “Epilogue”, 273.
  6. “Pennsylvania Control”, 173.
  7. Zach Fein, “CL&N Railroad Tunnel”, Local Architecture: Cincinnati, Accessed 23 April 2009.
  8. Ronny Salnero, “Beneath Your Feet – Exploring a Forgotten Railroad Tunnel – and More”, Queen City Discovery, Accessed 23 April 2009.

News: Derailment on I&O

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: News Railroads:




View Larger Map

I have received a message stating that yesterday there was a small derailment on the ’s Mason Subdivision. The local was reportedly on the former M&C mainline between Reed Yard and Monroe. Engine #4030 derailed as well as the lead set of trucks on the following car. The map above is an approximation of where the derailment may have occurred, I’ll update this post when more information becomes available.

Engine #4030 (renumbered from IORY #3075) was acquired by the I&O from the Burlington Northern GP40. The engine was originally built for the B&O.

Edit 1: The derailment location was confirmed as between Garver Road and Cincinnati-Dayton Road. This is actually a Norfolk Southern owned track and it was their MOW equipment cleaning up at the scene. While this was still on former M&C tracks, the current line between I&O and NS track is Garver Road.

New Atlas Cleaning Car

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Model Railroad

Recently I was visiting the Atlas forums and stopped to see what new products were being advertised on their main page. It turns out that Atlas is coming out with a new track cleaning car, and it looks to be an interesting and unique entry into the “cleaning car” market.

The model comes as a vaguely realistic maintenance of way car in four different pain schemes. It is pulled around by a locomotive but includes a motor in order to operate the small vacuum that pulls loose dirty particles up from the track. The car is long, I wouldn’t recommend using it on tight curves. In addition to the vacuum the car includes a reservoir for track cleaning fluid.

Beyond the vacuum the track cleaning car includes a spot for a removable cleaning head. Both a soft brush and a more abrasive head come with the car. It also includes an 8-pin hookup for DCC but no decoder. Atlas doesn’t recommend using it on a DCC layout without a decoder.

But what about the price? That’s the kicker. It retails for $109.95, far more than similar entries in the category, and just about as much as track cleaning cars made entirely of brass. At over a hundred dollars (plus decoder) it is certainly out of my price range and seemingly outside of Atlas’s normal “transet” demographic. I do, however, think this car is a unique product and could have its uses. Are any readers considering this car for cleaning their larger layouts?

Report from the Whitewater Valley

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Photo Essays Railroads:



View Larger Map

A few weeks ago, the Whitewater Valley Railroad started their 2009 excursion season. The Whitewater Valley is a non-profit tourist railroad that runs from Connersville to Metamora in Indiana (see map above). Earlier in the year I was invited on their annual pre-season inspection trip and have a few shots of the line to share. I’ll start with a quick photo of the power for the day, heading north out of Connersville and into the WVRR’s yard. Ex-P&G S-1 #9339 was also on hand for yard switching duties.

It was a little chilly on the crisp Saturday morning, but the ride was no less scenic. The Whitewater Valley owns 18 miles of track along the Whitewater River and we got to see the majority of it. Here’s a shot from their tallest bridge over the river.

The Whitewater Valley runs along the towpath of the historic Whitewater Canal. The railroad was originally built as the Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad over the length of the canal. The line eventually came to be part the Big Four, the New York Central, Penn Central, and finally Conrail. The Whitewater Valley began leasing their line from Penn Central in 1974 and formally purchased it in 1983. In a number of places the canal is still visible, and near Metamora it is partially restored as part of tourist operation during the summer.

Here’s another shot of the shops at Metamora. Not a lot was open but I’m sure once Spring hits in earnest things will get a lot more exciting here.

One of the Whitewater Valley’s wooden cabooses were also part of our train. This made for some interesting (and lengthy) switching moves at the runaround track at Metamora.

I had a good experience at my visit to the Whitewater Valley Railroad. There still were some bugs to be worked out with the crew, but I’m sure when open to the public everything went fine. I intend to return as soon as I can this summer to get some more photos with the summer foilage. If any readers are looking for something a little farther and different than the LM&M I would recommend them. It makes a nice day trip from Cincinnati.

References:

  1. http://www.whitewatervalleyrr.org/history.php

New Name, New Design, Same Site

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Administration

Well, it took a little longer than I expected, but I would like to welcome everyone to the new Lebanon Railroads site, which has been renamed Ohio Valley Rail.

It turns out that as much as I enjoy writing about Lebanon, only 1 road every went through the town and I felt like the title was a bit limiting. I’ll still be writing plenty about the LM&M and the CL&N, but now I feel like I have the freedom to expand out and write about other railroads.

In addition to the new name, the site also has a new address. Feel free to update your bookmarks to our new domain at www.ohiovalleyrail.com (or, ya know, don’t update cause the old domain will work too). Also check out the new favicon that shows up in your browser. If you squint hard enough you can see a steam locomotive in front of the state of Ohio.

Since we were getting a new name already, I went ahead and took the opportunity to completely overhaul the site. It looks a bit different doesn’t it? I hope you enjoy the new design (email me if you don’t). I want to go ahead and point out some new features the reader might be interested in.

  • New Feeds: I’ve replaced blogger as the default feed for the site with feedburner.com. This allows me to add a number of new features to our rss feed and also allows the new subscribe by email option. RSS too complicated for you? Just type your email address in that form on the upper-right and click subscribe. Ohio Valley Rail updates will soon be flowing to your inbox.
  • Amazon: There’s a new Amazon banner that I worked into the header of the page. It should feature railroad related products most of the time. It’s there if you’re interested, if not ignore it.
  • Categories: Also up top I added some navigation to the most popular categories on the site. Clicking History for instance brings up all posts that relate to history.
  • Posting Schedule: Finally I’m going to experiment with something different when it comes to my posting schedule. As close as I can manage, I’m going to attempt to post on Fridays with a history post every week. On Wednesdays, I’ll try and post something about modeling. This may not happen every week because I don’t write about modeling, but when I do it will be on Wednesday. If I have time, I’ll also write a Sunday or Monday post and this could be about anything. We’ll see how it works, but hopefully I can get into a rhythm and keep everyone coming back for more.

In conclusion, I hope you are excited about the new site as much as I am. I thrive on feedback, so let me know what you think. And remember, the comment box is always open under every post for your use. Now go out read some articles, and enjoy!

Please be patient over the next hour or so (hopefully) while I update Lebanon Railroads with a new design. They’ll be new colors, a new name, and all kinds of shiny goodness, so stick around cause it’s going to be awesome!

Also, it’s a perfect time to use this under construction graphic. It’s 1998 all over again!

1915 CL&N Account

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: History Railroads:

scan0003

This transcript is of a photocopied hand-written history of the by employee and brakeman Russell Fite. The photocopy was published in 1993 by Horace Russell. The transcript is my best interpretation of the hand writing. A lot of the statistics run together and it has been difficult to comprehend. I’ve tried to add line breaks where appropriate.

Notice that not all the statistics line up mathematically. I would not be surprised if this was an effect of my poor reading of Russell’s handwriting more than anything else. The scans I made have been put on the site’s flicker account, and I encourage anyone who is skillful in reading older script to see if corrections can be made to my transcript.

[Page 1]
The Dayton, Lebanon, & Cincinnati R.R. Terminal Co. bought by Pennsylvania Lines Dec 18, 1919 for $1,000,000. Shortest Railroad from Cincinnati to Dayton by six miles. It’s called the Cincinnati-Dayton Short Line Fast…[illegible] …Just DL&C town…Dec 31, 1914…11,103 miles of…Penn System.

[Page 2]
Extend the employ of the C.L.P. Wednesday July 23, 1916. Left the employ…Sept 9, 1916.
Trip pass to Eiclid to Lytle. Return Dec 15…Dec 26, 1916.

[Page 3](Listed as Page 13)
The Cincinnati Lebanon & Northern Ry.
Cincinnati to Dodds 25.8 Mi
Middletown Junc. To Middletown 14.23 Mi
Blue ash to Montgomery 1.35 Mi
DL&C (Dodds to Dayton 19.64 Mi
Lebanon Jct to Hempsted 3.63 Mi) 23.27 Total 74.72
2nd Track 5.3 Mi
Siding, ect; 33.98 Mi
Garage 4.8(1/2)Mi
Rail 54, 60, 70, 85 and 100 lbs
Total Milage including sidings ect, and track 113.96 miles.

History
Chartered Aug 1, 1885 under the laws of Ohio as successor to Cincinnati Northern Railway whose road was sold June 27, 1885. Road opened May 30, 1881.

[Page 4](Listed as page 14)
throughout Sept 5, 1881. The line from Middletown Junc. To Middletown was acquired June 1, 1902 from the Middletown and Cincinnati R.R.
On Jan 1, 1915 operating control of the Dayton, Lebanon & Cincinnati R. R. & T. Co. was acquired by the C. L. & N. In Feb. 1915 the capital stock was increased from 1,500,000 to 2,500,000. The company was authorized in March 19165 to issue $600,000 of the new stock $400,000 of which was used to purchase the CL&C R. R. and $200,000 to be used to settle an old claim of the City of Cincinnati.

[Page 5](Listed as Page 15)
Rolling Stock
Locomotives 24;
Cars-passenger 25; freight(box 4;[...] 1; refrigerator 1; flat 26[?]) 41
cabin 3
total 75
…: year ended June 30, 1915. …
Train Mileage
passenger 162,714;
freight 125,086;
mixed 2,106;
special 1,534.
Total 291,440 mi.
Passengers carried 430,805; carried / mile 4,997,350
Tons freight moved (revenue) [freight moved in revenue service] 822,192; moved/mile 18,095,836
Operating Revenue
passenger $162,934
freight $40,222
other $110,202
Total $574,358
Operating Expenses
maintenance of way $74,140
traffic expense $12,626
transportation expense $277,433
general expense $7,020
Total $482,072

[Page 6](Listed as page 16)
revenue from operation $92,286
tax Accruals $48,154
uncollectible revenue $623
total $48,777
Total Operating Income $43,509
Non-Operating Income $51,798
Gross Income $95,307

Deductions
Heir[?] of equipment $11,288
rentals $19,981
interest on Funded debt $57,921
other Interests $5,651
miscellaneous $128
total $55,007

Net Income $40,350

Surplus for year $29,020
Previous Surplus $150,699
Miscellaneous Credits $1,599
Total credit $181,263
…debt $46,019 (of which $45,000 appropriated for payment of dividends)
Profit and loss/Surplus

[Page 7] (Listed as page 17)
June 30, 1915 $135,244
General Balance Sheet June 30, 1915
Capital Stock $2,100,000
funded debt $1,394,000;
current liabilities $232,773;
deferred liabilities $7,180;
unadjusted credits $40,220
appropriated surplus $172,537;
profit and loss #135,244
total liabilities $4,001,954 Contra.[Capital?]
Investment in road, equipment, ect $3,746,756;
cash $80,672
other current assets $233,207
deferred assets $96
unadjusted debits $21,223
total assets $4,081,954
Capital Stock
authorized $2,500,000;
outstanding $2,100,000 all of which was owned by Pennsylvania Co.
shares $100 each
Dividends [at?] Dec 31 at treasury office Pittsburg[sic], Pa.

[Page 8] (Listed as page 18)
1906 3070; 1903[or 1907], 1900 … 1909, 1910 3070; 1911 &1912 4070; 1913 5070; 1914 3070; 1915 … looks do not close in adherence of payment. Transfer agent S.H. Chuck Sec. Pittsburg[sic], Pa. Annual meeting 3rd Wednesday in Feb at Cincinnati.
Directors
E.B. Taylor; J.J. Turner; D.J McCahe; G.L. Leak[?] Pittsburg[sic], Pa, S.E. Steanberger, R. Carvard…R.E. McCarthy Columbus
Officers
E.B. Taylor. Pres J.J. Turner Vic-Pres. J,N, McKnight, Treas. S. H. Chuoch, Sec J.W. Jor. And Pittsburg[sic], Pa. R.E. Banard Sukt. Cincinnati, O.

[Page 9] (Listed as page 19)
Controlled bu C.L.&N.
Dayton, Lebanon & Cincinnati R.R. & Terminal Co.

Dayton to Lebanon 25 mi.
Hempstead to Dayton Junc. 4 mi.
Lambet to Lakeland 1 mi.
Total 30 mi.
Sidings 4.13 mi.
Total including sidings, ect 34.13 mi.
Gauge 4 ft 81/2

History
Charted in perpetuity May 30, 1907 under Laws of Ohio as successor to the Dayton, Lebanon, & Cincinnati R. R. The present company began operations June 1, 1907. Operated by C.L.&.N. From Jan. 1, 1915 to June 30, 1915 for her earnings.
Merger
In Jan. 1915 control of this company was acquired bu the C.L.& N.
On July 1, 1915 the D.L.& C. R. R. & T. Co. was merged with the C.L.& N.
[Page 10] (Listed as page 20)
Rolling Stock June 30, 1915
Locomotives 7.
Cars passenger 7, combination 3, freight (box 6; flat 27, stock 10; coal 26;)69;
caboose 1
Total 80
Operations six months ended Dec. 31, 1914.
Operating revenues –
passenger $12,381;
freight $30,376
other $2,548
Total $45,315
Operating Expenses -
maintenance of way & structures $11,043;
maintenance of equipment $15,380
traffic expense $1,590
transportation $31,743
general $1,531
total $61,287
Deficit from operation $15,982
Tax accruals $3,354
Total operating deficit $19,336
Non-operating income $3,121
…deficit $16,215
Income from

[Page 11] (Listed as page 21)
lease of road (6 months to June 30, 1915)
deficit $26,383
total $42,598
Changes Hire of equipment $7,315;
rentals $498
interest on funded debt $14,798;
other interests $2,016
miscellaneous $66;
Total charges $24,693
Deficit for year $67,291
Deficit forward (39,970; miscellaneous credits $4,692) $35,278
Total June 30, 1915, $102,569

General Balance Sheet June 30, 1915.
Capital Stock $1,000,000
funded debt $300,000;
current liabilities $47,704
deferred liabilities $820
unadjusted credits $1,142
total liabilities $1,349,666
Contra-Investment in road, equipment ect. $1,222,538
Cash $16,198
other current assets $8,361
[Page 12](Listed as page 22)
Profit of Loss $102,569
Total Assets $1349,666

[Centerville Track Crew Photo]

[Pages 13 and 14 - Paychart]

[Pages 15 and 16 - Photos of Lester Road Accident]

[Page 17]
Russell Fite, brakeman on the picnic train was killed in the wreck. We owe him for this handwritten account of the C.L.& N and we dedicate this booklet to his memory. Lester Road crossing in Pleasant Ridge at 10:30 o’clock Tuesday morning August 1, 1922.

“The southbound Train No. 11, composed of five cars behind the locomotive, crashed into the northbound special excursion train of three cars, carrying several hundred to a picnic at Highland Grove.
The two trains came together with a terrific force, telescoping eascj other.
The splintering, ripping crash, and the hiss of steam were followed by the screams of the injured. The cars were entangled, twisted into each other presenting a terrifying aspect as those who were within the zone of the crash ran to the scene to render aid.
Most of the fatalities were among the occupants of the train bearing the excursion party, memebers of the Park Avenue M. E. church. When the two locomotives rushed together each rebounded from the impact, hurling their tenders back through the cars in the rear.
Word was telephoned immediately to Cincinnati and Fire Chief Houston and Police Chief Copelan, accompanied by fire apparatus, ambulances, life-saving squads and patrolmen and firemen were rushed to the scene to give what aid was possible.
The scene, as the work of removing the dead and rescuing the injured was carried on, was one of horror. Many were pinned, badly maimed, beneath the wreckage, shrieking for help. Others, stunned into unconsciousness, moaned piteously and willing hands strove to life the crushing weight from their imprisoned forms.
As rapidly as motors could whirl theme to the scene, the police and firemen arrived and plunged into the work of rescue. Every available ambulance was quickly filed with the injured and started for the general hospital.
Train No 11, the regular passenger train en route to Lebanon from Cincinnati, was manned by a crew consisting of E. Kahoe, conductor Rod Williams, engineer, and Charles Stevens, fireman.
The picnic train was in charge of George Morley, conductor, of Keniworth avenue, Norwood, who is reported to be seriously injured; John Meyers, Deer Park, engineer; J. Seelinger, fireman, Corryville; R. W. Brown, brakeman, of Elmwood Place, reported to have been killed, and R. Fire, brakeman, of Blue ash.”

There’s a couple of things that can be taken away from this account, though many of the financial statistics have been published in other forms. The mileage of sidings as well as the type of rail used is all useful information. It gives you an idea of what life was like on the railroad, and a brakeman who has the foresight to record all this information for posterity.

My favorite statistic is that in 1915 the railroad transported about 430,000 passengers. In 2003, Amtrak’s Cardinal had a ridership of about 70,000. So as it turns out, the CL&N in 1915 transported more passengers between Cincinnati and Lebanon then Amtrak did between Washington, Cincinnati, and Chicago1.

References:

  1. http://www.lightrailnow.org/facts/fa_amtrak-003.htm
  2. http://www.flickr.com/photos/37054594@N06/sets/72157616955335370/

What I’ve Learned From A Bridge

Author: Kyle Montgomery
Category: Model Railroad

This weekend I spent the most of my time working on a Central Valley Pratt Truss Bridge. This is a typical plastic styrine kit based of a prototype from 1902. I’m attempting to kitbash it into an okay representation of the former off-set truss bridge. The title of this photo is a view of the bridge from nearby US-42.

The Central Valley kit is of very good quality, though it is far more complex than anything I have build before. That’s not a bad thing, however, as it is far time I learn how to build kits that are more complex than the latest Atlas or Walthers offering. A more detailed view of this will be forthcoming when I finished the kit. Right now I just wanted to share the list of things I have learned from my bridge construction. These may seem like obvious tips to veteran modelers, but hopefully they will be of some use to those who like me are still hovering in the beginner zone.

5. Read the Directions

This is common advice, but it goes without saying. Read the directions completely before construction. Read them again before and during every subassembly. This was advice I had taken seriously before, but it is not good enough to just read the directions. It is important that they are completely understood. I thought it would be fine to just build a subassembly and then figure out what it does. If I had instead realized what the subassembly was for from the beginning, it would have helped me avoid some mistakes in construction.

4. Have the Necessary Tools

Many times I have attempted to build a model with just my trusty (often dull) Xacto Knife and Testors Glue. This was a bad idea. Having all the necessary clamps, drills, files, and saws not only makes things easier on you but also improves your modeling. When a wall is securely clamped you can focus on making it look good as opposed to damage control from all the glue that’s oozing out.

Often a kit will list the required and recommended tools to build it on the instructions (you did read the instructions right?). At the very least I would recommend adding a file and a small saw to your basics. This helps with separating parts off the plastic sprues and filing away some of the flash.

3. When In Doubt, Paint It

Someone who is a beginner modeler is often surprised when they see the improvements that can be made from painting a plastic kit. Plastic, even if colored to appropriate shades, still has an unrealistic “shine”. When painted not only does the kit look better but painting allows for more subtle variations of shade. Investing in a quality airbrush will often pay dividends in the long run. If that’s too complicated, don’t underestimate the power of the simple paintbrush, especially useful for doing small detail work. If even this is too hard, a simple coat of Testors dullcote will help cover up the plastic shine.

When I finish constructing my bridge I intend to give it a once-over in a rusty brown. Hopefully this should help cover up glue that has spilled out of joints and some of the rougher mistakes I made in construction.

2. Layout Your Parts

When constructing a subassembly, first cut all yours parts off the sprue and then lay them out on your work area. Be sure you have all the parts you need. This can be helpful for two reasons. First, on the off-hand chance the manufacturer forgot apart you would realize it before halfway through assembly. The other benefit would be if you misinterpreted the directions (like I did) you would be more likely to realize it. If you don’t have enough parts to complete the kit as the instructions indicate, there’s a good chance you have misread the instructions.

1. Be Careful with the Knife

While working on the bridge, I was frustrated to find that I had glued some joint-plates on a side that didn’t need them. Worse yet, to complete the kit I needed to take them off and use them elsewhere (see above). Frustrated, I went to work with my hobby knife to cut the misglued plates off so I could put them where they need to be. I knew that working the knife towards my hand was a bad idea, but in my annoyed state I did it anyway. A few minutes later I wondered why there was this red stuff all over my desk.

No matter how skillful you think yourself to be don’t think you are good enough to cut corners with a knife. Always keep a sharp blade and cut away from your hands and body. That way you won’t end up with a bloody thumb like me.

I’ll continue to chronicle my bridge building experience in future posts. Hopefully by then I’ll have more modeling wisdom to report and less modeling injuries.

Older Posts »